Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 14 Next »

Target release2.2
Epic GDM-40 - Getting issue details... STATUS
Document status
IN PROGRESS
Document owner
DesignerDeb Weigand
Tech leadLuke Cook
Technical writers
QA

Deb Weigand

Roy Petrie

Objective

Develop a framework that will allow QA to contribute test scenarios to a repository that can be run as regression tests for any GDM instance.

User Story

As a member of the development team, I need an automated back end regression testing framework so that test scenarios can be created and added and run to ensure the health of GDM code

  • Load:
    • create the entities needed
      • for samples, need to create
        • PI
        • project
        • experiment
        • platform
        • protocol
        • vendor
        • vendor-protocol
      • for markers, need to create
        • platform
        • mapset
        • marker group(s), if needed in subsequent extract
      • for datasets, need to create analyses
        • calling, and any other(s)
    • files to be provided for any load scenario
      • input file
      • json file
  • Extract
    • appropriate loads need to happen first 
    • files to be provided for extract scenario(s)
    • for Extract by Sample -
      • list of entities in .txt file format (germplasm names, external codes, or dnasample names)
    • for Extract by Marker - 
      • list of marker names in .txt file format, or
      • name of marker group
        • marker group will need to be created first
  • type of test - positive or negative
    • and whether comparisons are needed at the end
  • specify location
    • input files
    • output files if comparison needs to be done
  • No emails will be sent
  • view results to see which tests have passed and which tests have failed
    • for failed tests, need
      • access to logs
      • access to all artifacts
  • if a comparison is needed
    • Status: Failed/ Passed

      • Success Report

        • # of records

        • # of columns

        • Execution time

    • Failed Report:

      • Status: Failed/Passed

        • for each failure:

          • failure type

          • Record #

          • column #

    • Failure Types:

      • Data Validation failure

      • Genotype mismatch

Success metrics

GoalMetric
Be able to compare any outputs of an extract to corresponding loaded inputs


Assumptions

Stories

key summary type updated due assignee priority status
Loading...
Refresh

User interaction and design

Open Questions

QuestionAnswerDate Answered

Out of Scope

  • No labels