Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Page Properties


Target release2.2
Epic
Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
serverId3ed8d091-172c-31ee-8b1a-f688a0e72656
keyGWEB-22
Document status
Status
titleDRAFT
Document owner
DesignerDeb Weigand
Tech leadKevinPalis
Developer(s)KevinPalisJoshua Lamos-SweeneyLuke Cook
QADeb Weigand


Objective

Client's Goal: as per GR-136 (Jira server):
GOBii-GDM has been designed to allow breeding programs define their own meta information they would like to store without having to make modifications to database schema. These meta information are referred to as property fields or simply properties.

...

Users will like to be able to extract meta information they have loaded to GDM, both system defined and custom ones.

The following properties are up for discussion on whether they should be extracted or not:

  • Project props
    Mapset props
    Platform props

In addition, there is a need for IDs to be extracted for various entities.

...

  • For sample.file
    • Props (both system and user defined)
      • germplasm props
      • dnasample props
      • project props
    • IDs:
      • germplasm_id
      • dnasample_id
      • dnarun_id
  • For marker.file:
    • marker props (both system and user defined)
    • IDs:
      • marker_id
      • linkage_group_id
  • Headers for props fields in the files should be prefixed with the main entity table name. e.g. trial_name in dnasample props should have a header "dnasample_trial_name" in sample.file
  • Dataset.hmp.txt will contain all the props fields, both system and user defined

Acceptance Criteria:

...

Status
colourRed
titleHIGH

...

  • Extract output sample.file contains the props, both system and user defined, and the various IDs (as listed above)
  • Extract output marker.file contains the props, both system and user defined, and the various IDs (as listed above)

Success metrics

...

Assumptions

Requirements

...

  • Extract output Dataset.hmp.txt contains all the props fields, both system and user defined


Notes from meeting Wed 11/20:

Kevin had a question as to conflicts if a property has the same name in both system and user defined 

Nomenclature - We may need to prefix user defined props with something in order to remove any conflicts with system defined props  

Liz does not want any names changed that are currently in the extract now to prevent downstream QC analysis to fail 

Append to the end, the remaining system props and after that, the dynamic user property list 


List any assumptions you have about your users, technical constraints, or business goals (e.g., Most users will access this feature from a tablet)
Assumptions

Issues in Epic

Jira Legacy
serverSystem JIRA
columnskey,summary,type,assignee,priority,status,issuelinks
maximumIssues20
jqlQuery"Epic Link" = GDM-440
serverId3ed8d091-172c-31ee-8b1a-f688a0e72656

User interaction and design

Open Questions

QuestionAnswerDate Answered

Should the following properties be extracted:

  • project props
  • mapset props
  • platform props

yes to project props,

no to mapset and platform props

 
What samples fields should be included in Hapmap file?

...

all props fields should be included  

View file
namesample.file.txt
height250
View file
namemarker.file.txt
height250
wed 11/20